‘Sovereignty crisis’: a critical study of sovereignty on the political philosophy of Jacques Derrida

Authors

  • Daniel Carneiro Leão PUC-Rio e UFPE Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36592/opiniaofilosofica.2025.v16.1092

Keywords:

Crisis , Jacques Derrida, Sovereign Power, Sovereignty

Abstract

This text concerns the issue of sovereignty today according to the philosophy of Jacques Derrida. At first, the contours of sovereignty and its characteristics are presented from Derrida's reading. Then, a critique of sovereign power is made by adressing the themes of 'sovereignty crisis' and ‘rogue states’. This article presents a formulation of the problem of sovereignty based on Jacques Derrida's critique and contributes to studies on political philosophy and sovereignty.

References

APPLEGATE, Matt. The Beast and the Sovereign volume 1 by Jacques Derrida (2009) Reviewed. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, Volume IX, Issue 1/2, 2011.

BERNARDO, Fernanda. Introdução. In: DERRIDA, Jacques. Vadios. Trad. Fernanda Bernardo. Coimbra: Terra Ocre, 2005.

BIRD, Greg; SHORT, Jonathan. Community, immunity, and the proper: an introduction to the political theory of Roberto Esposito. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 18:3, 1-12, fevereiro, 2015.

BOURKE, Joanna. Fear: a cultural history. London: Virago, 2005.

CHEAH, Pheng. Second-generation rights as biopolitical rights. In: DOUZINAS, Costas; GEARTY, Conor. The Meanings of Rights: The Philosophy and Social Theory of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2014.

DERRIDA, Jacques. The Beast & the Sovereign (volume I). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 2009a.

______. The Beast & the Sovereign (volume II). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 2009b.

______. Força de Lei. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2010.

______. A escritura e a diferença. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2008a.

______. Gramatologia. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2008b.

______. Vadios. Coimbra: Terra Ocre, 2005.

______. O soberano Bem. Braga: Palimage editora. 2004.

______. ‘Globalisation, Peace, and Cosmopolitanism’ in Negotiations (Elizabeth Rottenberg, trans. and ed.). Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press, 2002.

______. Espectros de Marx: O estado da dívida, o trabalho de luto e a nova internacional. Rio de Janeiro: Dumará Distribuidora. 1994.

______. Positions. Paris: Minuit, 1972.

DE VILLE, Jacque. “Deconstructing the Leviathan: Derrida’s The Beast and the

Sovereign”. Societies, n.2, 357–371; 2012. Acesso em: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/2/4/357

DOUZINAS, Costas. Athens Revolting: Three Meditations on Sovereignty and One on Its (Possible) Dismantlement. Law and Critique, London, v. 21, n. 3, p.261-275, nov. 2010.

______. Humanity, military humanism and the new moral order. Economy And Society, [s.l.], v. 32, n. 2, p.159-183, jan. 2003.

GÓMEZ, José Maria. Soberania imperial, espaços de exceção e o campo de Guantánamo. Desterritorialização e confinamento na 'guerra contra o terror'. Contexto Internacional (PUCRJ. Impresso), v. 30, p. 210-230, 2008b.

HOBSON, Maria. The Final Seminars of Jacques Derrida: ‘The Beast and the Sovereign’. Edinburgh University Press, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 435-450 (16 pages), 2012. Acesso em:

https://www.jstor.org/stable/43263851

MOYN, Samuel. Human Rights and the uses of history. New York and London: Verso Books, 2014.

RASMUSSEN, Claire. Review essay: The Beast and the Sovereign, Biopolitics and Derrida’s Menagerie. Society and Space, volume 31, pages 1125 – 1133, 2013. Acesso em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/d3105rev?journalCode=epda

WERNER, Wouter. Costas Douzinas, Human Rights and Empire. The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism. International Journal For The Semiotics Of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, [s.l.], v. 21, n. 2, p.197-199, 7 maio 2008. Springer Nature. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11196-008-9069-1

Published

2025-07-21

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

CARNEIRO LEÃO, Daniel. ‘Sovereignty crisis’: a critical study of sovereignty on the political philosophy of Jacques Derrida. Revista Opinião Filosófica, Porto Alegre, v. 16, p. 1–19, 2025. DOI: 10.36592/opiniaofilosofica.2025.v16.1092. Disponível em: https://mail.opiniaofilosofica.org/index.php/opiniaofilosofica/article/view/1092.. Acesso em: 24 oct. 2026.